adminHarmonic Inc. (NASDAQ:HLIT) Q2 2024 Earnings Conference Call July 29, 2024 5:00 PM ET
Company Participants
David Hanover – Investor Relations
Nimrod Ben-Natan – President and Chief Executive Officer
Walter Jankovic – Chief Financial Officer
Conference Call Participants
Simon Leopold – Raymond James
Ryan Koontz – Needham & Company
Steven Frankel – Rosenblatt Securities
George Notter – Jefferies
Tim Savageaux – Northland Capital Markets
Operator
Welcome to the Second Quarter 2024 Harmonic Earnings Conference Call. My name is Amy, and I will be your operator for today’s call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers’ presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded.
I will now turn the call over to David Hanover, Investor Relations. David, you may begin.
David Hanover
Thank you, Operator. Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining us today for Harmonic’s second quarter 2024 financial results conference call. With me today are Nimrod Ben-Natan, President and CEO; and Walter Jankovic, CFO. Before we begin, I’d like to point out that in addition to the audio portion of the webcast, we’ve also provided slides for the webcast, which you may view by going to our webcast on our Investor Relations Web site.
Now turning to slide two, during this call, we will provide projections and other forward-looking statements regarding future events or future financial performance of the company. Such statements are only current expectations and actual events or results may differ materially. We refer you to documents Harmonic filed with the SEC, including our most recent 10-Q and 10-K reports and the forward-looking statements section of today’s preliminary results press release. These documents identify important risk factors, which can cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in our projections or forward-looking statements.
And please note that, unless otherwise indicated, the financial metrics we provide you on this call are determined on a non-GAAP basis. These metrics, together with corresponding GAAP numbers and a reconciliation to GAAP, are contained in today’s press release, which we have posted on our Web site and filed with the SEC on Form 8-K. We will also discuss historical financial and other statistical information regarding our business and operation, and some of this information is included in the press release. The remainder of the information will be available on a recorded version of this call or on our Web site.
And now, I’ll turn the call over to our CEO, Nimrod Ben-Natan. Nimrod?
Nimrod Ben-Natan
Thanks, David, and welcome everyone to our second quarter earnings call. Now turning to slide three, today we reported second quarter results that were at the high-end of our guidance in both our Broadband and Video segments. These results demonstrate the solid execution of our operating plans.
Before I go into the highlights of each business, I would like to make a few opening remarks. Our year-to-date results, full-year 2024 projections, and continued market momentum give us confidence that our broadband strategy remains on track for strong multiyear growth. During our June Analyst Day, we outlined our long-term growth plans, and today I’m going to provide updates on our progress.
Profitability is improving in our Video business as our rightsizing actions have taken hold and we are focused on a growing pipeline of new Tier 1 SaaS and larger scale appliance opportunities. Many of us watched the exciting opening ceremony of the Olympics through streaming on Peacock, and it is events like these that highlight our video SaaS capability to provide pristine quality at scale with the highest reliability. In a few minutes I will provide a status update on the actions we have taken and the opportunities ahead of us. Finally, with our focus to-date, we are reaffirming our full-year 2024 revenue guidance in both Broadband and Video, and Walter will provide more details.
Now turning to slide four, specifically to our Broadband business, Harmonic had another solid quarter of execution on our key programs. We reported segment revenue of $92.9 million compared to $97.1 million in the prior year, and up 17% sequentially, which was at the high end of our expectations. The number of global customers deploying our cOS solutions reached 118, up 20% year-over-year, corresponding with over 30 million DOCSIS cable modems now served worldwide. This represents approximately 18% of the global market. We are witnessing intensified competition among broadband service providers, prompting them to invest in their networks to deliver higher speeds, achieve greater reliability, enhance customer satisfaction, and reduce operating costs.
These market dynamics perfectly align with the unique capabilities and value offered by our cOS platform, driving the business momentum we are experiencing. During the second quarter, we shipped a record number of DOCSIS 4.0 outdoor nodes, and expect this trend to continue throughout the second-half of the year. These DOCSIS 4.0 nodes along with our cOS platform enable our customers to deliver symmetric multi-gig services over existing HFC networks.
To experience our innovative technology firsthand and witness the excitement of new customers, we invite you to see our demonstration of Unified DOCSIS 4.0 at the upcoming FCTE Conference in September. This significant market-leading development offers full optionality on both DOCSIS 4.0 flavors developed in collaboration with our silicone and operator partners. We’re also assisting our existing customers and new prospects with testing and trialing the boosted extended capabilities of DOCSIS 3.1, which enable them to achieve fiber speeds over their existing networks. We expect more customers to adopt this approach as the new class of DOCSIS 3.1 and 4.0 modems become available later this year.
While we are focused on expanding and scaling deployments with our largest existing customers, further diversifying our customer base remains a key priority. Demonstrating our progress, today we announced that Telecentro, a leading telecommunication operator in Latin America has selected our cOS Broadband platform to modernize its broadband network. Telecentro is a key player in driving broadband innovation in Latin America and represents another Tier-1 customer win for Harmonic. Additionally, we’re pleased with the progress we’ve made in growing our pipeline and securing bookings from customers looking to modernize their cable networks to enable greater reliability and higher upstream and downstream speeds.
Another topic I would like to discuss is fiber, which is a major part of our long-term growth strategy. We continue to gain traction in fiber-to-the-home with recent orders and wins. Last week, we announced that Paragould Utilities has selected our cOS platform to upgrade their network to 10G XGS while supporting existing ONUs. This is an important win in a new market that leverages our peer, a high density low power OLT shelf that began shipping in the second quarter.
We also announced a new product called Pearl, which uses the same foundational technology as Peer and is the market’s highest density Remote OLT. We have initial orders for Pearl from key international accounts and it has successfully passed customer testing and will begin production shipments in the third quarter. Pearl enhances our cOS portfolio enabling operators to deploy in any network topology with any ONU while leveraging a single virtualized broadband core platform.
In summary, our broadband business continues to grow and expand revenue. This is largely due to Harmonic’s unique market position, differentiated technology advantages, strong customer relationships, favorable industry dynamics and a rich array of new products and services that give us confidence in our multi-year growth outlook. We executed the first-half of ’24 in line with our plan and are confident in our ability to carry this momentum forward through the rest of ’24 and beyond.
Now turning to slide five, moving now to our Video segment, total segment revenue for second quarter was $45.8 million, compared to $58.9 million a year ago. Sequentially, segment revenue was up 6% and exceeded the high end of our guidance as we started to see the business stabilize. This included SaaS revenue of $14 million which was up 3.2% year-over-year. In Q2, we saw improving margins as we advanced towards positive EBITDA. This was due to the mix of business and our rightsizing actions. Our priorities going forward are to continue executing on our business streamlining initiatives to drive to profitability. We are currently ahead of schedule as seen in our second quarter results.
While we have seen modest growth in SaaS to-date, we are now seeing more momentum with positive industry trends and an active and growing pipeline of new Tier-1 customers, primarily driven by live sports. We are excited about the market activity around new live sports agreements as well as the new delivery of 4K immersive formats, which provides much higher bit rates and new level of viewing experiences, which our SaaS platform is perfectly designed for. The new in stream targeted ad monetization solution we presented at NAB a few months ago is gaining greater industry interest as it enables new ad placement opportunities for advertisers.
While we focus on releasing the service by the end of the year, we are working closely with the advertisement functions of our customers to integrate these new capabilities. On the appliance side of the business, we are seeing a refresh cycle of Playout and Compression Systems, which are driving increased pipeline and bookings with Tier-1 customers.
During the quarter, we booked a major refresh project with one of our largest international customers. Finally, I want to highlight the recent enhancement of our Board of Directors with the addition of three new members. Our new Directors bring a wealth of knowledge, expertise and experience from the Broadband and Telecom Industries. Their insights and guidance will be invaluable as we execute our strategic initiatives.
In conclusion, Harmonic delivered another robust quarter with revenue at the high end of our guidance range, while profitability in both businesses exceeded our expectations. These results demonstrated strong execution in both our Broadband and Video business as well as favorable market dynamics that continue to drive demand for our products and services.
With that, now over to you, Walter, for a deeper discussion of our financial results and outlook.
Walter Jankovic
Thanks, Nimrod, and thank you all for joining us today. Before I discuss our quarterly results as well as our outlook, I’d like to remind everyone that the financial results I’ll be referring to are provided on a non-GAAP basis.
As David mentioned earlier, our Q2 press release and earnings presentation includes reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP that are discussed on this call. Both of these are available on our website. Our second quarter results included revenue that was at the high end of our guidance and profitability in both businesses, which exceeded our expectations.
At the operations level, we exceeded the midpoint of broadband revenue guidance and exceeded the high end of revenue guidance in video. In terms of profitability, our overall second quarter non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA and EPS beat the high end of our guidance range.
I’ll call out some of our second quarter highlights here on slide seven. For the quarter, we reported total revenue of $138.7 million, which rose 14% quarter-over-quarter, EPS of $0.08, bookings of $72.4 million, and a book-to-bill of 0.5. At quarter-end, our backlog and deferred revenue was $613.1 million leaving us in a solid position while giving us greater visibility for the balance of the year. I would also like to note that in Q2, we recorded a GAAP net loss of $12.5 million or negative $0.11 EPS, which included restructuring costs of $11.5 million and $9 million in lease related asset impairments and other charges.
The restructuring costs are part of the plan announced during our prior quarter earnings call to reduce headcount and streamline our cost structure in the video business. The $9 million in lease related asset impairments and other charges reflect a reduction of our leased office space as we optimize our footprint and cost structure.
Before we review our second quarter financials in more detail and provide detailed Q3 and full-year 2024 guidance, I want to mention some important points about our guidance. Regarding broadband, we’re reaffirming our prior FY ’24 revenue guidance range of $460 million to $500 million. As we do each quarter, we closely evaluate the latest customer information, forecast and commitments just prior to the earnings call.
So, this updated guidance is based on our year-to-date results as well as our latest available information. At the midpoint of our FY ’24 broadband guidance, we expect revenue to increase 24% year-over-year. Due to the expected mix of business and OpEx savings, we have raised our FY ’24 broadband EBITDA forecast. Based on expected momentum in the second-half of the year, which we’ve already started to see, we continue to anticipate 2025 broadband revenue growth will accelerate on a year-over-year basis.
We continue to be well positioned with our strong backlog, customer wins and technology leadership to drive the expected growth we discussed during our recent Analyst Day. With regards to Video, we have largely completed executing on the restructuring plans that we previously communicated and are holding our FY ’24 revenue and EBITDA guidance.
Turning to slide eight, total Q2 revenue was $138.7 million compared to $156 million last year. This was at the higher end of our of the guidance range we provided on our last earnings call. Looking more closely at broadband, Q2 revenue was $92.9 million, a decrease of 4% year-over-year, inconsistent with our guidance. In Video, Q2 revenue was $45.8 million, which was above our guidance range. Video revenue included SaaS revenue of $14 million, up 3% year-over-year, and representing 30.6% of segment revenue for the quarter.
Video SaaS revenue growth continues to be driven by live sports streaming. SaaS expansions and new customer wins. In the second quarter, we had one customer representing greater than 10% of total revenue, with Comcast representing 48% of total revenue.
Total company gross margin was 53.1% for Q2 ’24, which is above the high end of our guidance range and reflecting better than expected Video segment gross margin. Broadband gross margin was 47.6% for Q2 ’24 up 10 basis points sequentially and down 290 basis points year-over-year due to product mix. Video gross margin was 64.4% in Q2 ’24 up 270 basis points year-over-year, and 280 basis points sequentially, mainly due to higher SaaS and SLA mix, coupled with cost reductions.
Moving down to income statement on slide nine, Q2 ’24, operating expenses were $61.5 million down 8.5% year-over-year, just at EBITDA for Q2 ’24 was $16.1 million, also above our guidance range, comprised of $16.3 million from broadband and negative $0.3 million from video. This all translated into Q2 ’24 EPS of $0.08 per share compared with $0.00 in Q1 ’24 and $0.12 per share for Q2 ’23.
One housekeeping item I want to mention is that for Q2 ’24 and full-year ’24, we have adjusted our non-GAAP tax rate to 21% versus the previous 19% rate. This is to reflect the updated U.S. versus foreign income mix. We ended the second quarter of 2024 with a calculated diluted weighted average share count of 116.7 million, compared to 118.1 million in Q1 ’24 and 119.3 million in Q2 ’23. The sequential decrease is primarily due to share buyback activity.
Turning to the order book, Q2 bookings were $72.4 million. As I mentioned earlier, the book-to-bill ratio for the quarter was 0.5 compared to 1.2 in both Q1 ’24 and Q2 ’23. The second quarter’s 0.5 book-to-bill ratio is due to decreasing order lead times in our broadband business. This is because we’ve been working with our larger customers to secure supply based on committed forecasts, resulting in customer orders with shorter lead times.
For example, in July, we received orders for product that will be shipped out in the second-half of this year. Off note, these orders in July far exceeded our broadband order bookings for all of Q2. As we stated previously, over time, we expect our book-to-bill ratio to normalize and approach the historical benchmark of greater than one.
Turning to the balance sheet on slide 10, we ended Q2 ’24 with cash and cash equivalents of $45.9 million. This amount excludes restricted cash of $2.9 million. The quarter-over-quarter, change in cash was mainly attributable to negative cash from operations of $22.2 million the result of a significant reduction in accounts payable based on timing of material receipts this quarter compared to prior quarters, increasing accounts receivable related to our higher revenues in Q2 and $3.5 million in cash restructuring costs in the quarter.
In Q2, we used $8.4 million of cash for share repurchases, which I’ll discuss in more detail shortly. The free cash flow during the quarter was negative $24.1 million. We expect our cash balance to increase in Q3 and Q4 based on the projected collections and timing of material receipts.
Turning to accounts receivables and Day Sales Outstanding, at the end of Q2 ’24, DSO was 78 compared to 78 in Q1 ’24 and 69 in the prior period. The prior year period, was lower due to a large customer taking an early pay discount. Days inventory on hand was 116 days at the end of Q2 ’24 compared to 134 at the end of Q1 ’24 and 145 at the end of Q2 ’23.
Inventory decreased 2.5 million in the quarter, as we continue to shorten days of inventory between receipt and customer shipment. In terms of capital allocation, when appropriate, we will strategically invest in building inventory, as we’ve done in the past to meet strong demand.
Regarding liquidity in December 2023, we closed a five year $160 million credit facility that included $120 million revolving credit line and a $40 million delayed draw term loan. Subsequent to the end of the first quarter on April 18, we redeemed entirely the $115.5 million in convertible notes outstanding, repaying the principal in cash by using our credit facility and the value over par was settled with approximately $4.6 million in shares.
As of today, we have drawn down to $115 million on this credit facility. And as I mentioned earlier, during Q2 ’24 we bought back $8.4 million, or approximately 750,000 shares at an average price of $11.14 under our repurchase program. To-date, we have repurchased $35 million of the $100 million approved under our repurchase program. As we’ve said previously, the timing and amount of any stock repurchases will depend on a variety of factors, including the price of Harmonics common stock market, conditions, corporate needs and regulatory requirements.
Also, as mentioned during our prior earnings call, we plan to manage, prudently manage our balance sheet by maintaining overall net leverage of around two times or less and available liquidity of no less than $100 million going forward. We believe we have sufficient available liquidity to continue funding our growth plans while returning capital to our shareholders through stock repurchases.
At the end of Q2 total backlog and deferred revenue was $613.1 million. Our strong backlog continues to demonstrate the demand we’re seeing from our large broadband customers and growing video SaaS commitments, around 52% of our backlog and deferred revenue as customer request dates for shipments of products, and for providing services within the next 12 months.
As discussed during our last earnings call, as part of our go forward strategy Harmonics video business will be centered on driving profitable growth, by focusing on scalable market opportunities, streamlining its operations and optimizing its cost structure.
So, aligned with this go-forward strategy, as previously stated, we have been implementing a restructuring program to achieve cost savings in this business. The majority of these initiatives are now completed, and we expect the remaining actions to be completed by no later than the end of Q3 this year. We currently expect total restructuring related severance costs to be $15.4 million for the fiscal year, of which $14.5 million has been recorded as of Q2 year-to-date.
As previously stated, we expect to achieve approximately $18 million in savings in FY ’24 from these and another actions and approximately $28 million in savings on an annualized basis in FY ’25. We believe these actions are necessary to better align the video business with our go forward strategy.
With that, let’s now review our non-GAAP guidance for the third quarter beginning on slide 11. We expect broadband to deliver revenues between $130 million to $140 million. Gross margins between 48% to 49% due to product mix, gross profit between $63 million to $69 million, and adjusted EBITDA between $34 million to $39 million. For the full-year, we expect revenues between $460 million to $500 million. Gross margins between 47% to 49%, which reflects a more conservative margin based on the product mix that we currently expect. Gross profit between $216 million to $245 million and adjusted EBITDA between $102 million to $126 million.
For broadband, we expect to hit record levels of revenue in both Q3 and Q4, due to the expected sales momentum in the second-half of the year that I mentioned earlier. For our Video segment in Q3, we expect revenue in the range of $45 million to $50 million. Gross margin in the range of 63% to 64%, gross profit in the range of $28 million to $32 million and adjusted EBITDA to range from $0 million to $3 million. For the full-year, we expect revenue between $185 million to $195 million, gross margins between 63% to 64%, gross profit between $117 million to $125 million, and adjusted EBITDA to range from $0.00 million to $5 million.
Turning to slide 12, for the third quarter of ’24, we expect total company revenue in the range of $175 million to $190 million, gross margin in the range of 51.9% to 52.9%, gross profit to range from $91 million to $101 million, adjusted EBITDA to range from $34 million to $42 million, a weighed average diluted share count of 117 million, and EPS to range from $0.19 to $0.24. And for the full-year, we expect revenue between $645 million to $695 million, gross margins between 51.6% to 53.2%, gross profit between $333 million to $370 million, adjusted EBITDA between $102 million to $131 million, a weighted average diluted share count of 117.3 million, and the EPS to range from $0.56 to $0.75.
In summary, our solid second quarter results reflect the progress we’ve made in executing on our FY’24 plan. This included revenue at the upper end of our guidance as well as EBITDA and EPS that exceeded our guidance. We believe our Broadband segment continues to be well-positioned for future growth. In addition with the restructuring actions we’ve taken and the progress that’s been made, we believe our Video segment will attain profitability starting in Q3. Thank you everyone for your attention today.
And now, I’ll turn it back to Nimrod for final remarks before we open up the call for questions
Nimrod Ben-Natan
Thanks, Walter. In summary, Harmonic delivered another strong quarter, capping solid year-to-date financial and operational execution. Our company continues to be exceptionally well-positioned for sustained growth, and to create greater value for our shareholders. Looking forward, we’re committed to implementing our 2024 and long-term growth plans. We thank you all for your continued support and look forward to speaking with you again on our next earnings call and updating you on our progress.
Let’s now open up the call for questions.
Question-and-Answer Session
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Simon Leopold with Raymond James. Your line is open.
Simon Leopold
Great, thank you for taking the question, I’ve got two. The first one is actually regarding the SaaS Video business. I’d like to see if you could help us understand a little bit better the, I guess, structure of your terms. And really what I’m getting at is I’m wondering how material the Olympics could be and, more generically, how we should think about that business going forward? Basically, do you get paid by how many times events are viewed? Do you get paid by events or agreements? That kind of detail would just be helpful for us to think about modeling. Thank you.
Walter Jankovic
Okay, Simon, it’s Walter. I’ll take that question in terms of the commercial model of our SaaS Video business. So, first of all, the model generally works on minutes streamed and number of events, that’s the core tenet of the model. In addition to that, if we provide the content delivery, the CDN part of it, it’s going to flex based on the number of viewers in terms of that part of the model.
And when you look at the targeted ad insertion part of the model, this part of the model is based on impressions, so the number of people thorough the impressions metric, so very much variable in terms of that part of the business. So, really, there’s three key elements of the business, and it just depends what the customer has signed up to in terms of ad insertion if they’re a targeted ad insertion customer, if they’re obviously a streaming customer it’s based on minutes streamed, the number of events. And then if we provide the content delivery, that’s based on number of viewers and flexes in that manner.
Have I helped to explain that?
Simon Leopold
Yes. I guess just a quick one, is the Olympic, as an event, material enough to move the numbers or if it’s sort of just in the noise relative to the overall streaming activity?
Walter Jankovic
Yes, it’s going to be immaterial. It’s not going to be material based on the commercial model.
Simon Leopold
In the overall market, it does seem as if broadband competition is heating up, particularly with the, say, traditional telcos expanding efforts around fixed wireless and around fiber to the home, it’s not clear to us if the cable operators really have adjusted their strategies in response. And maybe they would argue that they’re already investing adequately. We’re just wondering whether or not from your perspective you’re noticing any change in the competitive environment for your customers or whether this is sort of an ongoing evolution? Thank you.
Nimrod Ben-Natan
Well, we think that what they predicted a few years back is actually materializing in terms of the competition, fiber. I don’t think they predicted the fixed wireless, but they predicted that there will be competition in the long-term plan to keep investing in the network to make it more competitive is more important than ever before. And I think what we hear from them is that what we were on for them is important. Obviously, they have different strategies in terms of what exactly they do and how quickly they do that. But I think the urgency is high, and this is what we’re hearing from them.
Simon Leopold
Thank you very much.
Walter Jankovic
Thanks, Simon.
Operator
Our next question comes from Ryan Koontz with Needham & Company. Your line is open.
Ryan Koontz
Thanks for the question, and a nice quarter and outlook. Want to ask you about DOCSIS 4.0 and how would you frame your competitive position there, Nimrod, relative to hardware? I know you guys have the leading software solution, but relative to this new hardware product, how would you frame the competitive environment there for DOCSIS 4.0?
Nimrod Ben-Natan
I think with the move to unified, there is a requirement to support the two flavors of DOCSIS 4.0. And I think we’ve got a unique leadership position as we have been working on the full duplex flavor of 4.0 for quite some time. And it’s shipping, and in production. And the unified is combining that along with the FDD, the extended spectrum. So, in short, I would say I believe, although we never discount any competition, that we’ve got a significant lead.
Ryan Koontz
That’s great, was hoping to hear that. And on your new fiber wins, can you give us any feel for what sorts of customers these are coming from, is it mainly North America or global or primarily cable still? I know you’ve talked about a couple of wins in traditional telco. Anything you could share there on the fiber wins just on a broad sense?
Nimrod Ben-Natan
Well, [Palego] (ph) specifically is a pure telco. We talked about that, that this is a new win with a new product in a new market. The other wins we talk about or that I mention is for the other new product is an international customer that is cable, telco, and wireless, so this is more of a converge, but they are cable as well. And well, I think that’s pretty much what we announced in terms of wins so far.
Ryan Koontz
Okay, that’s great. And just a clarification from Walter on the gross margin beat on Video. It was my understanding, I thought that the SaaS business actually had lower gross margin than the Appliance business because it lacked scale. Is that no longer true, that the SaaS, now margins may be better than Appliance?
Walter Jankovic
Well, when you look at the overall appliance margin, including new product that’s shipping out combined with the SLAs and you look at where we are with SaaS, as mentioned earlier, we have taken some cost reduction actions across the board in video and some of that is enhancing our margin profile in SaaS as well. And we are getting to a larger scale as demonstrated with now running at $14 million in Q2. So, the margins are improving.
Ryan Koontz
Got it. That’s all I’ve got. Thanks for the questions.
Nimrod Ben-Natan
Okay. Thanks, Ryan.
Operator
Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Steven Frankel with Rosenblatt Securities. Your line is open.
Steven Frankel
Hi, good afternoon. Thanks for the opportunity to ask questions. I’d like to follow-up on this comment of shorter lead times around the broadband business and where do you think the lead times are? And is it materially different between a 4.0 product and your 3.1 or 3.1 enhanced products at this point?
Walter Jankovic
Hey, Steve, it’s Walter. I’ll start on that one. So, specifically with regards to lead times, before we had indicated, we’ve got lead times out there of 50 weeks on certain products. Custom products, you’re going to have longer lead times. The non-custom products, definitely we’re seeing some movement downward in terms of the lead times.
And then, specifically with regards to the earlier remarks that I made in regards to what we’re seeing with ordering patterns, I just want to make sure that’s clear as well. Some of our larger customers can put their orders in, in shorter lead time to us based on giving us binding forecast, so we can go out there and procure. So, I just want to make sure that that’s clear as well in terms of one of the other fundamental differences there in terms of orders and turning around orders when we get them.
Steven Frankel
And Walter, could you repeat what you said about the magnitude of the orders in July?
Walter Jankovic
Yes. In July alone, we in broadband, we have booked orders that far exceed what we booked in broadband for all of Q2. And those orders are for product that’s going to be shipped out in the second-half of this year.
Steven Frankel
Perfect. And then, maybe, Nimrod, just to comment on where we are with DOCSIS 3.1 Enhanced, you had a — if I go back to SCTE in September, it looked like a large group of customers that were interested in this and would finally get them going. Is that still to come? Are those products not quite ready for Prime Time yet and therefore those customers haven’t gotten deployed yet?
Nimrod Ben-Natan
So, I want to clarify that everything that, in fact, we ever shipped from Remote 5 point of view is extended 3.1 capable. You’ve got the hardware to do that. We enabled a software release earlier in the year, so that’s available. Really, what they wait for is availability of Modems. And 4.0 Modems are subject to new modem from MaxLinear and I think there is a camp of others that are so called JDA and the new class of 3.1 is coming later this year. So, it’s really a modem-dependent issue at the moment, which they are looking to test and once they feel comfortable, they will move forward with that.
Steven Frankel
Great. Thank you so much. I’ll jump back in the queue.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of George Notter with Jefferies. Your line is open.
George Notter
Hi, guys. Thanks very much. I guess I wanted to ask about the ramp in expectations over the second-half of the year. If I do some back the envelope math here, at midpoint, you’re doing $182 million in sales in September and then I think nearly $220 million sales in Q4. So, assuming I have my math correct, it’s a pretty significant ramp. And I heard certainly what you said about the order rates picking up and that’s great. But can you give us a little bit more insight into where that ramp comes from? I assume we’re talking about your two largest customers on the broadband side of the business, but any more you can tell us that kind of reinforces your confidence in that ramp over the balance of the year? Thanks.
Walter Jankovic
Yes, certainly. Hey, George, it’s Walter. So, first of all, it is dependent and it’s based on the top two customers in terms of what we expect for the second-half of the year. And so, therefore we do expect a big contribution based on the top 2. However, we also have growth in our non-top two, so, for the rest of the market in terms of customers in both Q3 and Q4 timeframe.
So, we’ve looked through in terms of our backlog, in terms of the commitments, in terms of all of our expectations to ensure that we could come back and reaffirm what we’ve told you over the last couple of quarters in terms of our guidance for the full-year on broadband. So, that’s a little more color in terms of where is the growth coming from and what you should expect to see in terms of top two versus the rest of the market.
George Notter
Got it. And then, I think also not that long ago, we talked about some excess inventory at some of these larger customers. I assume that’s worked off now or is that still part of the narrative? How do you think about it?
Walter Jankovic
Well, generally, we’ve got one customer who’s just starting to ramp and starting to build out of their network. And then, with another large customer, we’ve got the transition to FDX and as you could see from our results in Q2, that’s going to plan in terms of the ramp up associated with that technology transition. So, I think — you think about it from those two perspectives in terms of each of those customers and what they’re doing and where they are with regards to their build out plans.
George Notter
Okay. Thanks very much. Appreciate it.
Walter Jankovic
Okay. Thanks, George.
Operator
Our last question comes from the line of Tim Savageaux with Northland Capital Markets. Your line is open.
Tim Savageaux
Hi, good afternoon, and congrats on the results and reiterated outlook. And I guess my question was sort of along the same line, maybe try to get a little more specific. In that, clearly, Charter came off your 10% customer list here in the quarter, giving the timing of their kind of upgrade, whether it was exactly July 9th or not. It seems like that order input is probably closely aligned with that. So, should we assume, and I’ll get your other top customer in a minute, but there have been some pretty dramatic moves quarter-to-quarter. Should we assume what you’re guiding for Q3 is the real, you’ve seen some Charter revenue to date, but the real beginning of the upgrade in earnest?
Walter Jankovic
Well, I think, Tim, we can’t speak specifically about any customer’s ramp in any detail here. I think what we’re going to see is, what I mentioned to the earlier question from George in terms of top two customers contributing significantly to the second-half. So, I am indicating that part of it just in terms of the concentration, where is the growth coming from and that’s probably all I’m going to say about specifically about any of the customers. I think there’s also this non-top two customers where we’re seeing traction. We mentioned today, and Nimrod mentioned this in terms of another Tier-1 win with Telecentro. So, we are gaining traction across the rest of the market and that also factors into our second-half projections.
Tim Savageaux
Okay. Well, maybe if I could follow-up on that a little bit. And well, first, Walter, did you say 50% of the backlog shippable next 12 months? Just want to make sure I got that number right.
Walter Jankovic
52%.
Tim Savageaux
Over 50%?
Walter Jankovic
52%.
Tim Savageaux
Okay, great. Sorry. You’re cutting out a little bit.
Walter Jankovic
Yes, we were very specific with it. Yes.
Tim Savageaux
Well that’s refreshing. Well, in that context and I say this, look in Q1 ’23, you had a real big bump in orders, right, coincident with your announcement in the Charter relationship in a 2.07 book-to-bill. I think your backlog was up $170 million. I think your orders were up $200 million from Q4?
Walter Jankovic
And this kind of figures in with the lead time conversation as well, I mean, looking at what you shipped to date, it doesn’t seem to come close to that type of number, and you seem to be getting follow-on orders here, which is interesting. And I guess my overall question is, how would you characterize what’s in the longer-term backlog? Is that multiyear because you talk about shortening lead times in the run rate of the hardware, what’s in the other 48% as much color as you can give in terms of broadband versus video and just the type of agreements we’re talking about. Thanks.
Nimrod Ben-Natan
Yes. I think the way I would characterize the other 48% in terms of anything that’s beyond one year. Obviously, when folks are committing to a longer term, there’s a couple of factors. One factor is it’s a commitment to build as part of the commercial commitment. There’s also — when you think about hardware versus software, I think I’ve mentioned this before, is that there’s certain lead time around hardware. So, some of that backlog is definitely on the cOS license basis. And then, we’ve got other things that are longer-term commitments around SLAs and things of that nature that go out further than 12 months. So, that’s how I would characterize the different elements of what is in there beyond the one year.
Tim Savageaux
Great. And last question for me, has that changed much in the last few quarters? Got a long time at this point.
Nimrod Ben-Natan
No, I think, no, not much at all over the last couple of quarters. If you go back to last quarter, it was close to that same level.
Tim Savageaux
Okay. Thanks a lot.
Nimrod Ben-Natan
Okay. Thanks, Tim.
Operator
Okay. One moment please. And we have a follow-up question from George Notter with Jefferies. Your line is open.
George Notter
Hi, thanks for letting me ask a follow-up. All right, so as I look at your 10% customer information, I’ve got Comcast at about $65 million this quarter. And if I look back at some of the biggest quarters from Comcast about 1.5 years ago, there was a $79 million quarter, a $74 million quarter.
Although, I know that there was some inventory bill during those periods of time. So, it kind of feels like Comcast’s run rate of business in terms of maybe organic installations of your equipment, feels like it’s around $60 million, $65 million kind of where you’re at right now. So, when I look at the ramp in expectations over the second-half of the year, I guess, I assume it’s just heavily, heavily skewed to Charter. And implicitly, it feels like you’re saying Charter is going to go and become as big, or bigger than Comcast in terms of their sizing for you guys. Do I have the right kind of general view of where the revenue ramp comes from? Is that appropriate or no?
Nimrod Ben-Natan
Okay. George, without getting into — as you know, we can’t get into specifics in guiding each customer here. I think you’re making certain assumptions around one versus the other. And I’m not going to comment are your assumptions correct or not correct. I think what you — what we said previously in our prior earnings calls, we have been very explicit about the technology transition on FDX and the ramp-up of that over the year. And we explained that going back to the beginning of this year and the expectation of what that’s going to do to our numbers in terms of first-half versus second-half. We were clear about that.
Without getting into specifics around any other customer or specific numbers or guidance around the customers, I think there’s — these two customers are significant. I’ve highlighted that earlier. And I think it’s fair to say that they’re both contributing, but I’m not going to give specific numbers on one versus the other.
George Notter
Okay. Fair enough. Thank you very much. I appreciate it.
Nimrod Ben-Natan
Okay. Thanks, George.
Operator
And I’m showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the conference back to Nimrod for closing remarks.
Nimrod Ben-Natan
Thank you all for joining us today for the call. Have a good day.
Operator
And this concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
Read the full article here
